 |
Aggadot from Hamivtar
Rabbi Yitzchak Blau
If you have comments or questions please feel free to e-mail
Rabbi
Blau
at:
nyz@netvision.net.il
|
Torah Only and Having a God
When R. Elazar ben Parta and R. Hannina ben Teradyon were captured, R. Elazar said
to R. Hannina: “You are fortunate as you were captured for one offence. Woe is me
as I was captured for five offences.” R. Hannina said to him: “ You are fortunate as
you were captured for five offences and you will be saved. Woe is me who was captured for one offence and I will not be saved because you engaged in Torah and
gemilut hasadim (acts of compassion) and I was only involved in Torah alone. It is as
Rav Huna taught. R. Huna said: “Whoever is only involved in Torah, it is as if he has
no God as it says ‘And there where many days in Israel without a true God’ (Divrei
Hayamim II 15:3). What does the verse mean when it says ‘without a true God?”
That anyone who only involves himself with Torah is compared to someone without a
God.” (Avodah Zarah 17b)
The sharp formulation of Rav Huna demands explanation. While we can easily understand that Torah learning without acts of compassion leaves a person
religiously incomplete and inadequate, that hardly constitutes lacking a God. Why
does Rav Huna employ such a harsh and sweeping formulation? Rashi explains that
the person lacks a God to protect him as God will only step in to aid the compassionate. If so, the Torah only personality obviously has a God but not a God
who will provide succor.
R. Shmuel Edels (Maharsha) offers a beautiful alternative explanation. He points out
that the Divine attributes (see the famous list in Shemot 34:6-7) are predominantly
about compassion. Furthermore, the attempt to emulate God, to the best of our
human ability, represents a significant religious ideal. Thus, the person who eschews
acts of kindness must have a fundamentally flawed conception of the Divine. A
person who truly understood the nature of God would be drawn to emulate His compassion. If so, the person with only Torah is in reality “without a true God.”
In addition, this gemara clearly rejects the idea that hessed can be accomplished in a
metaphysical manner. Some say that everyone who learns Torah engages in an act
of compassion because that Torah learning improves the world in some grand cosmic
way. If we push such an idea too far, there would be no category of Torah without
hessed. Apparently, compassion must be expressed in a naturalistic way when my
own efforts and resources are directed towards helping other flesh and blood human
beings. May we successfully integrate the great twin religious callings of Torah and
hessed.
Return to Aggadot Home